 |
Rfuw Go-To Man for Oil Well Blowouts Feels Pressure
WASHINGTON - The Senate voted Tuesday to effectively block the Justice Department from undertaking gun-smuggling probes like the flawed Operation Fast and Furious aimed at breaking up networks running guns to Mexican drug cartels but that lost track of hundreds of the weapons, some of which were used to commit crimes in Mexico and the United States.The 99-0 vote would block the governm <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley mug</a> ent from transferring guns to drug cartels unless federal agents continuously monitor or control the weapons. The amendment s sponsor, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, called the vote just the first step towards ensuring that such a foolish operation can never be repeated by our own law enforcement. The Justice Department has already stopped the program.A Justice Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because Congress did not ask the department for its views, said the amendment essentially reflects DOJ polic <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.us>stanley bottles</a> y.In an interview Tuesday with ABC News, President Barack Obama said we will find out who and what happened in this situation and make sure it gets corrected. The vote came as the Senate debated a $128 billion spending measure that would fund Just <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley cup</a> ice Department operations and those of several other Cabinet agencies for the 2012 budget year already under way.DOJ: No 3rd gun in Fast and Furious murderIssa to press FBI for gunwalking infoHolder subpoenaed for documents in Gunwalker AG Holder responds to critics on GunwalkerOperation Fast and Furious was a gun-smugg Ahss Drinking And Flying Allegation
The next company in a seemingly never-ending deluge of company working on some <a href=https://www.stanley-cups-uk.uk>stanley quencher</a> kind of online TV streaming service It Amazon, according to a WSJ report. Amazon has apparently approached some major media conglomerates to strike up some deals for a service that would combine channels you might get on cable with content you could stream on Amazon. As it often goes with these reports, the companies Amazon has been chatting up have not been named, although there are supposedly three of them, and they ;re presumably the networks you ;d traditionally think of as mostly on your regular ol ; television set. First off, given its selection of streaming content as well as its own original shows, Amazon has at least some leverage studios and other media companies. And secondly, Amazon has proved itself willing to sacrifice immediate profits where it sees it could make long term gains. Other companies are of course giving this kind of service a try. Intel had been throwing big bucks at a TV streaming offering, but it sold the project to Verizon late last year, most likely due to an inability to lock up content. Netflix is purportedly working on its own kind of future TV p <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup</a> roject too, but these deals just aren ;t happening yet. But as the WSJ points out, Amazon might be in the best position to actually mak <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley spain</a> e the unicorn of a streaming TV service a real thing. https://gizmodo/verizon-is-buying-intels-wildly-ambitious-internet-tv-1505640873 The WSJ |